Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
By the Numbers: Tracking The AI Executive Order | Stanford HAI

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
policyExplainer

By the Numbers: Tracking The AI Executive Order

Date
November 16, 2023
Topics
Regulation, Policy, Governance
Government, Public Administration
abstract

New Stanford tracker analyzes the 150 requirements of the White House Executive Order on AI and offers new insights into government priorities.

Read full article

Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • headshot
    Caroline Meinhardt
  • Christie M. Lawrence
    Christie M. Lawrence
  • Lindsey A. Gailmard
    Lindsey A. Gailmard
  • Daniel Zhang
    Daniel Zhang
  • Rishi Bommasani
    Rishi Bommasani
  • Rohini Kosoglu
    Rohini Kosoglu
  • Peter Henderson
    Peter Henderson
  • Russell Wald headshot
    Russell Wald
  • Dan Ho headshot
    Daniel E. Ho

Related Publications

Response to OSTP’s Request for Information on the Development of an AI Action Plan
Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Rishi Bommasani, Jennifer King, Russell Wald, Percy Liang, Daniel E. Ho
Mar 17, 2025
Response to Request

In this response to a request for information issued by the National Science Foundation’s Networking and Information Technology Research and Development National Coordination Office (on behalf of the Office of Science and Technology Policy), scholars from Stanford HAI, CRFM, and RegLab urge policymakers to prioritize four areas of policy action in their AI Action Plan: 1) Promote open innovation as a strategic advantage for U.S. competitiveness; 2) Maintain U.S. AI leadership by promoting scientific innovation; 3) Craft evidence-based AI policy that protects Americans without stifling innovation; 4) Empower government leaders with resources and technical expertise to ensure a “whole-of-government” approach to AI governance.

Response to Request

Response to OSTP’s Request for Information on the Development of an AI Action Plan

Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Rishi Bommasani, Jennifer King, Russell Wald, Percy Liang, Daniel E. Ho
Regulation, Policy, GovernanceMar 17

In this response to a request for information issued by the National Science Foundation’s Networking and Information Technology Research and Development National Coordination Office (on behalf of the Office of Science and Technology Policy), scholars from Stanford HAI, CRFM, and RegLab urge policymakers to prioritize four areas of policy action in their AI Action Plan: 1) Promote open innovation as a strategic advantage for U.S. competitiveness; 2) Maintain U.S. AI leadership by promoting scientific innovation; 3) Craft evidence-based AI policy that protects Americans without stifling innovation; 4) Empower government leaders with resources and technical expertise to ensure a “whole-of-government” approach to AI governance.

Safeguarding Third-Party AI Research
Kevin Klyman, Shayne Longpre, Sayash Kapoor, Rishi Bommasani, Percy Liang, Peter Henderson
Feb 13, 2025
Policy Brief
Safeguarding third-party AI research

This brief examines the barriers to independent AI evaluation and proposes safe harbors to protect good-faith third-party research.

Policy Brief
Safeguarding third-party AI research

Safeguarding Third-Party AI Research

Kevin Klyman, Shayne Longpre, Sayash Kapoor, Rishi Bommasani, Percy Liang, Peter Henderson
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceFeb 13

This brief examines the barriers to independent AI evaluation and proposes safe harbors to protect good-faith third-party research.

Assessing the Implementation of Federal AI Leadership and Compliance Mandates
Jennifer Wang, Mirac Suzgun, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Kazia Nowacki, Daniel E. Ho
Jan 17, 2025
White Paper

This white paper assesses federal efforts to advance leadership on AI innovation and governance through recent executive actions and emphasizes the need for senior-level leadership to achieve a whole-of-government approach.

White Paper

Assessing the Implementation of Federal AI Leadership and Compliance Mandates

Jennifer Wang, Mirac Suzgun, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Kazia Nowacki, Daniel E. Ho
Government, Public AdministrationRegulation, Policy, GovernanceJan 17

This white paper assesses federal efforts to advance leadership on AI innovation and governance through recent executive actions and emphasizes the need for senior-level leadership to achieve a whole-of-government approach.

Expanding Academia’s Role in Public Sector AI
Kevin Klyman, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Elena Cryst, Russell Wald, Aaron Bao
Dec 04, 2024
Issue Brief
Expanding Academias role in public sector ai

This brief analyzes the disparity between academia and industry in frontier AI research and presents policy recommendations for ensuring a stronger role for academia in public sector AI.

Issue Brief
Expanding Academias role in public sector ai

Expanding Academia’s Role in Public Sector AI

Kevin Klyman, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Elena Cryst, Russell Wald, Aaron Bao
Government, Public AdministrationDec 04

This brief analyzes the disparity between academia and industry in frontier AI research and presents policy recommendations for ensuring a stronger role for academia in public sector AI.

OSZAR »